AEMV vs VOO

AEMV vs VOO

Which is better, AEMV or VOO?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. AEMV is less concentrated, with 28.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: AEMV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAEMVVOO
Expense Ratio0.38%0.03%Best
AUM-$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings97509
YTD Return-1.59%+11.48%Best
1Y Return-+15.94%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.66%
Top 10 Weight28.3%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 26, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AEMV vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AEMV vs VOO Performance

Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Value ETF (AEMV) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AEMV is down 1.59% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AEMV charges 0.38% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AEMV currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

AEMV already in VOO57.0%
VOO already in AEMV2.6%

57.0% of AEMV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.6% of VOO's money is in holdings AEMV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

50 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in AEMV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 97 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 438 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for AEMV (96.6% of the fund), and 42 for AEMV that do not appear in VOO (39.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AEMVWeight in VOODifference
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp3.48%0.14%3.34%
AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc3.48%0.08%3.40%
HSTHost Hotels & Resorts Inc3.03%0.02%3.01%
SNASnap-On Inc.2.83%0.03%2.80%
TROWT Rowe Price Grp2.48%0.04%2.44%
PSXPhillips 662.21%0.13%2.08%
PFGPrincipalfinancialgroupinc.2.17%0.03%2.14%
HPQHp Inc.2.08%0.04%2.04%
NTAPNetapp Inc2.07%0.05%2.02%
NUENucor Corp.1.91%0.09%1.82%

57.0% of AEMV is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AEMVVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AEMV or VOO?

AEMV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AEMV and VOO?

57.0% of AEMV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.6% of VOO's is in holdings AEMV also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in AEMV and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, AEMV or VOO?

AEMV yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than AEMV?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. AEMV is less concentrated, with 28.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.