AESB vs FLQS
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF vs Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Which is better, AESB or FLQS?
FLQS costs less.
FLQS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AESB | FLQS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $48M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| Holdings | 335 | 562 |
| YTD Return | -7.25% | +11.62%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.07% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 26, 2026 | Apr 26, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AESB vs FLQS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AESB vs FLQS Performance
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF (AESB) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Year to date, AESB is down 7.25% versus a gain of 11.62% for FLQS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AESB charges 0.38% per year while FLQS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $35 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESB currently yields 0.00% against 1.49% for FLQS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 167 holdings in AESB and 37 in FLQS, totalling 99.7% and 56.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 37 in FLQS, against full books of 335 and 562.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AESB and FLQS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AESB or FLQS?
AESB has an expense ratio of 0.38% while FLQS charges 0.35%. FLQS is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, AESB or FLQS?
AESB yields 0.00% while FLQS yields 1.49%, so FLQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLQS better than AESB?
FLQS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.