AIQ vs VYM
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, AIQ or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. AIQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIQ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $10.0B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 92 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +24.40%Best | +13.91% |
| 1Y Return | +35.67%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.56%Best | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.52%Best | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.6% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.7% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,572Best | $17,758 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.3% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 11, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 16, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (8.3 years).
AIQ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.3 years both funds cover.
AIQ vs VYM Performance
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AIQ returned +35.67% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, AIQ is up 24.40% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, AIQ compounded at +31.56% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +15.52% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, AIQ has the edge at +19.18% annualized vs +10.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 15.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.7% for AIQ and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIQ charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIQ currently yields 0.07% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
14.4% of AIQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.0% of VYM's money is in holdings AIQ also owns.
AIQ and VYM share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in AIQ and 603 in VYM, against full books of 92 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 560 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for AIQ (84.5% of the fund), and 46 for AIQ that do not appear in VYM (57.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIQ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.97% | 7.29% | 4.32% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.01% | 1.93% | 1.08% |
| ORCLOracle Corp. | 3.39% | 1.04% | 2.35% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.79% | 1.10% | 0.69% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.39% | 0.81% | 0.58% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 0.84% | 0.32% | 0.52% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co. | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.31% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors N.V. Common Stock | 0.48% | 0.29% | 0.19% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AIQ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIQ or VYM?
AIQ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIQ or VYM?
Over the past year AIQ returned +35.67% vs +17.57% for VYM, so AIQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AIQ annualized +19.18% vs +10.32% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIQ or VYM?
AIQ has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AIQ -44.7% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both AIQ and VYM?
AIQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIQ and VYM?
14.4% of AIQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.0% of VYM's is in holdings AIQ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in AIQ and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIQ or VYM?
AIQ yields 0.07% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than AIQ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. AIQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.