AIQ vs VTI
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AIQ or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AIQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AIQ is less concentrated, with 32.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10.0B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 92 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +22.42%Best | +11.53% |
| 1Y Return | +31.39%Best | +15.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.48%Best | +20.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.00%Best | +11.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.6% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,114Best | $17,303 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.3%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 11, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 16, 2018 to Sep 15, 2026 (8.3 years).
AIQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.3 years both funds cover.
AIQ vs VTI Performance
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AIQ returned +31.39% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, AIQ is up 22.42% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, AIQ compounded at +31.48% per year against +20.67% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.00% and +11.59% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, AIQ has the edge at +18.92% annualized vs +13.46%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 17.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.7% for AIQ and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIQ charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIQ currently yields 0.07% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
66.3% of AIQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 36.8% of VTI's money is in holdings AIQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
49 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in AIQ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 92 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,108 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for AIQ (60.6% of the fund), and 6 for AIQ that do not appear in VTI (6.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIQ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.89% | 6.40% | 3.51% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.80% | 6.29% | 3.49% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.64% | 4.79% | 1.15% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.02% | 3.65% | 0.63% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.92% | 2.90% | 0.02% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.61% | 2.56% | 0.05% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 4.04% | 0.37% | 3.67% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.65% | 1.70% | 0.95% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.09% | 1.22% | 1.87% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.61% | 1.29% | 1.32% |
66.3% of AIQ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIQ or VTI?
AIQ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIQ or VTI?
Over the past year AIQ returned +31.39% vs +15.74% for VTI, so AIQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AIQ annualized +18.92% vs +13.46% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIQ or VTI?
AIQ has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 17.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AIQ -44.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both AIQ and VTI?
AIQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIQ and VTI?
66.3% of AIQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 36.8% of VTI's is in holdings AIQ also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in AIQ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIQ or VTI?
AIQ yields 0.07% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AIQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AIQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AIQ is less concentrated, with 32.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.