AKAF vs VOO
The Frontier Economic Fund ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AKAF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AKAF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.98% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 143 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.73% | +12.63% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.95% | +20.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Frontier Economic Fund | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AKAF vs VOO Performance
The Frontier Economic Fund ETF (AKAF) is a ETF from Frontier Economic Fund and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AKAF returned +22.95% while VOO returned +20.89%. Year to date, AKAF is up 13.73% versus a gain of 12.63% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.8% for AKAF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for AKAF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AKAF charges 0.20% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AKAF currently yields 2.98% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AKAF and VOO share 78 holdings out of 576 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AKAF or VOO?
AKAF has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AKAF or VOO?
Over the past year AKAF returned +22.95% vs +20.89% for VOO, so AKAF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AKAF annualized +27.92% vs +13.44% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AKAF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.8% for AKAF. Worst drawdown: AKAF -9.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AKAF and VOO?
AKAF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AKAF and VOO?
AKAF and VOO share 78 common holdings with a 15.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 576 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AKAF or VOO?
AKAF yields 2.98% while VOO yields 1.08%, so AKAF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.