AOD vs SBIO
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 105 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | SBIO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $202M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 4.05% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 87 | |
| YTD Return | +19.25% | +33.81% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.02% | +104.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.41% | +32.13% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +9.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 29.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -63.1% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | ALPS Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Dec 30, 2014 |
AOD vs SBIO Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year AOD returned +34.02% while SBIO returned +104.89%. Year to date, AOD is up 19.25% versus a gain of 33.81% for SBIO.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.41% per year against +32.13% for SBIO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and +9.61% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, SBIO has the edge at +9.72% annualized vs -4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBIO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 21.9% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -63.1% for SBIO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while SBIO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $50 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 4.05% for SBIO.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and SBIO share 1 holdings out of 189 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOD | Weight in SBIO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZN:LN | 1.52% | 0.00% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or SBIO?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or SBIO?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.02% vs +104.89% for SBIO, so SBIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), AOD annualized -4.00% vs +9.72% for SBIO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or SBIO?
SBIO has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 21.9% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs SBIO -63.1%.
Should I hold both AOD and SBIO?
AOD and SBIO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and SBIO?
AOD and SBIO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 189 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or SBIO?
AOD yields 11.72% while SBIO yields 4.05%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.