ARKW vs HUMM
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, ARKW or HUMM?
HUMM costs less.
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | HUMM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 88 | 20 |
| YTD Return | +3.87%Best | -12.56% |
| 1Y Return | -9.01% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +42.77% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.45% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.6%Best | 57.0% |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Sep 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ARKW vs HUMM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ARKW vs HUMM Performance
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF (HUMM) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ARKW is up 3.87% versus a loss of 12.56% for HUMM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while HUMM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $49 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.00% for HUMM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 40 holdings in ARKW and 20 in HUMM, totalling 96.5% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 20 in HUMM, against full books of 88 and 20.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for HUMM that do not appear in our book for ARKW (68.5% of the fund), and 36 for ARKW that do not appear in HUMM (89.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKW and HUMM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or HUMM?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while HUMM charges 0.49%. HUMM is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or HUMM?
ARKW yields 1.47% while HUMM yields 0.00%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HUMM better than ARKW?
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. ARKW is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.