ASD vs VTI

ASD vs VTI

Which is better, ASD or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASD is less concentrated, with 32.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: ASD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricASDVTI
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$1M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.02%1.03%
Holdings403,543
YTD Return+10.35%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-+16.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Top 10 Weight32.4%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyDefiance ETFs, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 1, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ASD vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ASD vs VTI Performance

Defiance Autism Impact ETF (ASD) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ASD is up 10.35% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ASD charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASD currently yields 0.02% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

ASD already in VTI53.9%
VTI already in ASD3.3%

53.9% of ASD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.3% of VTI's money is in holdings ASD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

21 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in ASD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 40 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,137 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ASD (94.1% of the fund), and 2 for ASD that do not appear in VTI (2.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ASDWeight in VTIDifference
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.35%1.35%1.00%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.66%0.86%1.80%
LFSTLifestance Health Group Inc3.44%0.00%3.44%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.72%0.61%2.11%
RGENRepligen Corp3.26%0.01%3.25%
ACADAcadia Pharmaceuticals Inc Common Stock Usd 0.00013.24%0.00%3.24%
RVTYRevvity Inc3.04%0.02%3.02%
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co.2.81%0.18%2.63%
BMRNBiomarin Pharmaceutical Inc.2.81%0.02%2.79%
PFEPfizer Inc2.60%0.20%2.40%

53.9% of ASD is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ASDVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ASD or VTI?

ASD has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ASD and VTI?

53.9% of ASD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.3% of VTI's is in holdings ASD also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in ASD and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, ASD or VTI?

ASD yields 0.02% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than ASD?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASD is less concentrated, with 32.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.