AUSF vs SCHD
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, AUSF or SCHD?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. AUSF led over 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. AUSF is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUSF | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $919M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 195 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +11.24% | +24.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.96% | +28.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.81%Best | +15.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03%Best | +9.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 16.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,279Best | $16,032 |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.6%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2018 to Sep 10, 2026 (8 years).
AUSF vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
AUSF vs SCHD Performance
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year AUSF returned +13.96% while SCHD returned +28.14%. Year to date, AUSF is up 11.24% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.
Over three years, AUSF compounded at +18.81% per year against +15.58% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and +9.90% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, AUSF has the edge at +11.16% annualized vs +11.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AUSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 16.5% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUSF charges 0.27% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $6 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.66% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
16.7% of AUSF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 45.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings AUSF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
26 positions in common, counted across the 192 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 195 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 73 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for AUSF (54.1% of the fund), and 162 for AUSF that do not appear in SCHD (80.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AUSF | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 1.96% | 3.97% | 2.01% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.28% | 4.17% | 2.89% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.54% | 4.77% | 4.23% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 1.44% | 2.78% | 1.34% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 1.37% | 2.79% | 1.42% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.07% | 4.02% | 3.95% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.28% | 2.79% | 1.51% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.08% | 3.83% | 3.75% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.53% | 3.33% | 2.80% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 0.45% | 2.31% | 1.86% |
45.8% of SCHD is already inside AUSF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUSF or SCHD?
AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AUSF or SCHD?
Over the past year AUSF returned +13.96% vs +28.14% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +11.16% vs +11.16% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AUSF or SCHD?
AUSF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 16.5% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both AUSF and SCHD?
AUSF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and SCHD?
45.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings AUSF also owns. 45.8% of SCHD's is in holdings AUSF also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 192 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or SCHD?
AUSF yields 2.66% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than AUSF?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. AUSF led over 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. AUSF is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.