AUSF vs VOO
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AUSF or VOO?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AUSF led over 5Y, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. AUSF is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUSF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $919M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 195 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.24% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.96% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.81% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03%Best | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,279Best | $18,262 |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.6%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2018 to Sep 10, 2026 (8 years).
AUSF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
AUSF vs VOO Performance
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AUSF returned +13.96% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, AUSF is up 11.24% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, AUSF compounded at +18.81% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.81% annualized vs +11.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AUSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 16.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUSF charges 0.27% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $3 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.66% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
68.7% of AUSF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 34.1% of VOO's money is in holdings AUSF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
127 positions in common, counted across the 192 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 505 in VOO, against full books of 195 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 370 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for AUSF (65.3% of the fund), and 61 for AUSF that do not appear in VOO (28.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AUSF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.19% | 6.59% | 5.40% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.65% | 4.30% | 2.65% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 0.08% | 3.25% | 3.17% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 1.43% | 1.42% | 0.01% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.96% | 0.72% | 1.24% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.08% | 2.59% | 2.51% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.69% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 1.96% | 0.27% | 1.69% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
| RTXRaytheon Technologies Corp | 1.60% | 0.40% | 1.20% |
68.7% of AUSF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUSF or VOO?
AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AUSF or VOO?
Over the past year AUSF returned +13.96% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +11.16% vs +13.81% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AUSF or VOO?
AUSF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 16.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AUSF and VOO?
AUSF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and VOO?
68.7% of AUSF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 34.1% of VOO's is in holdings AUSF also owns. They hold 127 positions in common, counted across the 192 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or VOO?
AUSF yields 2.66% while VOO yields 1.04%, so AUSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than AUSF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AUSF led over 5Y, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. AUSF is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.