AUSF vs VTI
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUSF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $919M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.62% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 198 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.14% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.43% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.45% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
AUSF vs VTI Performance
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AUSF returned +18.14% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, AUSF is up 14.50% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, AUSF compounded at +20.43% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.45% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, AUSF has the edge at +11.68% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AUSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUSF charges 0.27% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $3 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.62% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AUSF and VTI share 166 holdings out of 2813 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUSF or VTI?
AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AUSF or VTI?
Over the past year AUSF returned +18.14% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +11.68% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AUSF or VTI?
AUSF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AUSF and VTI?
AUSF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and VTI?
AUSF and VTI share 166 common holdings with a 15.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2813 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or VTI?
AUSF yields 2.62% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AUSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.