AUSF vs VTI
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AUSF or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AUSF led over 5Y, VTI over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUSF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $919M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 195 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.24% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.96% | +17.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.81% | +20.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03%Best | +11.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3%Tie | 17.3%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,279Best | $17,404 |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2018 to Sep 10, 2026 (8 years).
AUSF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
AUSF vs VTI Performance
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AUSF returned +13.96% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, AUSF is up 11.24% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, AUSF compounded at +18.81% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs +11.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AUSF and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 17.3% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUSF charges 0.27% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $3 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.66% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 85.5% of AUSF's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of AUSF is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
165 positions in common, counted across the 192 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 195 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AUSF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.19% | 5.84% | 4.65% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.65% | 3.81% | 2.16% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 0.08% | 2.88% | 2.80% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 1.43% | 1.24% | 0.19% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.96% | 0.57% | 1.39% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.64% | 0.84% | 0.80% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.08% | 2.27% | 2.19% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 1.96% | 0.22% | 1.74% |
| RTXRaytheon Technologies Corp | 1.60% | 0.35% | 1.25% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.25% | 0.68% | 0.57% |
85.5% of AUSF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUSF or VTI?
AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AUSF or VTI?
Over the past year AUSF returned +13.96% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +11.16% vs +13.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AUSF or VTI?
AUSF and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 17.3% annualized. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both AUSF and VTI?
AUSF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and VTI?
At least 85.5% of AUSF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 165 positions in common, counted across the 192 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or VTI?
AUSF yields 2.66% while VTI yields 1.03%, so AUSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AUSF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AUSF led over 5Y, VTI over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.