AUSF vs QQQ
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, AUSF or QQQ?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AUSF is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUSF | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $919M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 195 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +11.24% | +15.86%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.96% | +22.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.81% | +24.15%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03% | +14.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3%Best | 20.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,279 | $19,390Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.6%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2018 to Sep 10, 2026 (8 years).
AUSF vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
AUSF vs QQQ Performance
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year AUSF returned +13.96% while QQQ returned +22.63%. Year to date, AUSF is up 11.24% versus a gain of 15.86% for QQQ.
Over three years, AUSF compounded at +18.81% per year against +24.15% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and +14.16% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.70% annualized vs +11.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 17.3% for AUSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUSF charges 0.27% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $18 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.66% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
11.3% of AUSF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 30.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings AUSF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 192 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 195 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 77 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for AUSF (66.4% of the fund), and 170 for AUSF that do not appear in QQQ (86.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AUSF | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.19% | 7.27% | 6.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.65% | 5.76% | 4.11% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.96% | 2.10% | 0.14% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.25% | 2.41% | 1.16% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 0.08% | 3.36% | 3.28% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.08% | 3.13% | 3.05% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.41% | 1.00% | 0.41% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 0.13% | 1.84% | 1.71% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.47% | 0.81% |
| TMUST-Mobile Us Inc Com Usd0.00001 | 0.76% | 0.82% | 0.06% |
30.6% of QQQ is already inside AUSF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUSF or QQQ?
AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AUSF or QQQ?
Over the past year AUSF returned +13.96% vs +22.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +11.16% vs +18.70% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AUSF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 17.3% for AUSF. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both AUSF and QQQ?
AUSF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and QQQ?
30.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings AUSF also owns. 30.6% of QQQ's is in holdings AUSF also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 192 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or QQQ?
AUSF yields 2.66% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so AUSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than AUSF?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AUSF is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.