AVLV vs JDVL
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF vs John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF
Which is better, AVLV or JDVL?
AVLV has been ahead.
AVLV has a lower expense ratio. AVLV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVLV | JDVL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.56% |
| AUM | $22.3B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.45% |
| Holdings | 615 | 81 |
| YTD Return | +23.00%Best | +17.03% |
| 1Y Return | +29.54%Best | +20.27% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.28% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.44% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7%Best | 11.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.4%Best | -9.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,862Best | $13,123 |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | Aug 6, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 6, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026 (1.3 years).
AVLV vs JDVL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
AVLV vs JDVL Performance
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year AVLV returned +29.54% while JDVL returned +20.27%. Year to date, AVLV is up 23.00% versus a gain of 17.03% for JDVL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JDVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.7% compared with 10.7% for AVLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.4% for AVLV and -9.2% for JDVL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVLV charges 0.15% per year while JDVL charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $56 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVLV currently yields 1.09% against 1.45% for JDVL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AVLV and JDVL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVLV or JDVL?
AVLV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while JDVL charges 0.56%. AVLV is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVLV or JDVL?
Over the past year AVLV returned +29.54% vs +20.27% for JDVL, so AVLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AVLV annualized +28.56% vs +23.25% for JDVL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVLV or JDVL?
JDVL has been the more volatile fund at 11.7% annualized versus 10.7% for AVLV. Worst drawdown: AVLV -6.4% vs JDVL -9.2%.
Should I hold both AVLV and JDVL?
AVLV and JDVL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVLV or JDVL?
AVLV yields 1.09% while JDVL yields 1.45%, so JDVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JDVL better than AVLV?
AVLV has a lower expense ratio. AVLV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.