BAGX vs IVV

BAGX vs IVV

Which is better, BAGX or IVV?

BAGX has been ahead.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): BAGXLess Concentrated: BAGX

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAGXIVV
Expense Ratio0.73%0.03%Best
AUM$196M$882.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings87508
YTD Return+5.85%+13.60%Best
1Y Return-+16.32%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.81%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.03%
Top 10 Weight28.5%Best38.1%
Fund FamilyBridgeway FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 24, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BAGX vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BAGX vs IVV Performance

EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BAGX is up 5.85% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAGX charges 0.73% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $3 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAGX currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

BAGX already in IVV74.8%
IVV already in BAGX42.0%

74.8% of BAGX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 42.0% of IVV's money is in holdings BAGX also owns.

Most of BAGX is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

63 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 505 in IVV, against full books of 87 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 434 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BAGX (57.2% of the fund), and 26 for BAGX that do not appear in IVV (20.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BAGXWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp5.96%8.00%2.04%
AAPLApple, Inc4.61%7.39%2.78%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.72%5.57%1.85%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A4.13%3.00%1.13%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.71%3.80%2.09%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.14%2.15%1.01%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.0.86%1.66%0.80%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.14%1.27%0.13%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity1.84%0.56%1.28%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.58%0.55%1.03%

74.8% of BAGX is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BAGXIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAGX or IVV?

BAGX has an expense ratio of 0.73% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BAGX and IVV?

74.8% of BAGX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 42.0% of IVV's is in holdings BAGX also owns. They hold 63 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BAGX or IVV?

BAGX yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BAGX?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.