BAGX vs SPY

BAGX vs SPY

Which is better, BAGX or SPY?

BAGX has been ahead.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns (1Y): BAGXLess Concentrated: BAGX

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAGXSPY
Expense Ratio0.73%0.09%Best
AUM$196M$811.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.98%
Holdings871,515
YTD Return+4.92%+12.70%Best
1Y Return-+15.53%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.47%
Top 10 Weight28.5%Best38.2%
Fund FamilyBridgeway FundsState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 24, 2026Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BAGX vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BAGX vs SPY Performance

EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, BAGX is up 4.92% versus a gain of 12.70% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAGX charges 0.73% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $9 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAGX currently yields 0.00% against 0.98% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

BAGX already in SPY74.8%
SPY already in BAGX42.0%

74.8% of BAGX's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 42.0% of SPY's money is in holdings BAGX also owns.

Most of BAGX is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

63 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 504 in SPY, against full books of 87 and 1,515.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 434 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for BAGX (57.2% of the fund), and 26 for BAGX that do not appear in SPY (20.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BAGXWeight in SPYDifference
NVDANvidia Corp5.96%7.78%1.82%
AAPLApple, Inc4.61%7.45%2.84%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.72%5.71%1.99%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A4.13%3.12%1.01%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.71%3.78%2.07%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.14%2.22%1.08%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.0.86%1.59%0.73%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity1.84%0.52%1.32%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.14%1.22%0.08%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.58%0.51%1.07%

74.8% of BAGX is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BAGXSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAGX or SPY?

BAGX has an expense ratio of 0.73% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BAGX and SPY?

74.8% of BAGX's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 42.0% of SPY's is in holdings BAGX also owns. They hold 63 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, BAGX or SPY?

BAGX yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than BAGX?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.