BAMD vs VTI
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $98M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.50% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 98 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.63% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.63% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
BAMD vs VTI Performance
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMD returned +14.63% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, BAMD is up 14.63% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.7% for BAMD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for BAMD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMD charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMD currently yields 3.50% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BAMD and VTI share 73 holdings out of 2807 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMD or VTI?
BAMD has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMD or VTI?
Over the past year BAMD returned +14.63% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMD annualized +15.44% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.7% for BAMD. Worst drawdown: BAMD -15.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BAMD and VTI?
BAMD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMD and VTI?
BAMD and VTI share 73 common holdings with a 8.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2807 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMD or VTI?
BAMD yields 3.50% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BAMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.