BAMD vs VTI
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BAMD or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $98M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 98 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.78%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +10.81% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.18% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $14,886 | $18,369Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3 years).
BAMD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMD vs VTI Performance
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMD returned +10.81% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, BAMD is up 12.78% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, BAMD compounded at +14.18% per year against +20.89% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.6% for BAMD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for BAMD and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMD charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMD currently yields 3.30% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
84.3% of BAMD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.4% of VTI's money is in holdings BAMD also owns.
Most of BAMD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
80 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in BAMD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 98 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,079 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BAMD (89.1% of the fund), and 4 for BAMD that do not appear in VTI (2.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 5.29% | 1.31% | 3.98% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 6.06% | 0.05% | 6.01% |
| BXBlackstone Group Inc. Class A | 5.37% | 0.13% | 5.24% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 4.75% | 0.08% | 4.67% |
| ESEversource Energ | 4.59% | 0.04% | 4.55% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.97% | 0.26% | 3.71% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 3.72% | 0.47% | 3.25% |
| EIXEdison Intl | 3.63% | 0.04% | 3.59% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.19% | 0.41% | 2.78% |
| VNOMViper Energy I-A | 2.92% | 0.01% | 2.91% |
84.3% of BAMD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMD or VTI?
BAMD has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMD or VTI?
Over the past year BAMD returned +10.81% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.6% for BAMD. Worst drawdown: BAMD -15.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BAMD and VTI?
BAMD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMD and VTI?
84.3% of BAMD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.4% of VTI's is in holdings BAMD also owns. They hold 80 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in BAMD and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMD or VTI?
BAMD yields 3.30% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BAMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BAMD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.