BAMD vs IVV
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $98M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.50% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 98 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.63% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.63% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BAMD vs IVV Performance
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BAMD returned +14.63% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, BAMD is up 14.63% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.7% for BAMD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for BAMD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMD charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMD currently yields 3.50% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BAMD and IVV share 53 holdings out of 549 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMD or IVV?
BAMD has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMD or IVV?
Over the past year BAMD returned +14.63% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMD annualized +15.44% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMD or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.7% for BAMD. Worst drawdown: BAMD -15.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BAMD and IVV?
BAMD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMD and IVV?
BAMD and IVV share 53 common holdings with a 9.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 549 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMD or IVV?
BAMD yields 3.50% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BAMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.