BASG vs REGS
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, BASG or REGS?
REGS has been ahead.
REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | REGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $516M | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 36 | 124 |
| YTD Return | +13.39% | +16.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.37% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.0%Best | 49.2% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Mar 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BASG vs REGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BASG vs REGS Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, BASG is up 13.39% versus a gain of 16.92% for REGS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $35 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for REGS.
Holdings Overlap
34.0% of BASG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 31.8% of REGS's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 60 in REGS, against full books of 36 and 124.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 51 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for BASG (64.0% of the fund), and 24 for BASG that do not appear in REGS (53.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
34.0% of BASG is already inside REGS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or REGS?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while REGS charges 0.35%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and REGS?
34.0% of BASG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 31.8% of REGS's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 60 in REGS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or REGS?
BASG yields 0.00% while REGS yields 0.00%, so REGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REGS better than BASG?
REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.