BBHM vs VTI
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBHM or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBHM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.81% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $357M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 30 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +7.33% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.35% | +12.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 13.2%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.1% | 34.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Brothers Harriman | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BBHM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BBHM vs VTI Performance
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) is an ETF from Brown Brothers Harriman and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBHM returned +11.35% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, BBHM is up 7.33% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBHM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBHM charges 0.81% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $81 vs $3 annually, a gap of $78 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBHM currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.4% of BBHM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.9% of VTI's money is in holdings BBHM also owns.
Most of BBHM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
29 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BBHM and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 30 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,103 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BBHM (96.0% of the fund), and 0 for BBHM that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBHM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENTGEntegris Inc Common Stock Usd 0.01 | 5.72% | 0.03% | 5.69% |
| WSOWatsco Inc | 4.60% | 0.01% | 4.59% |
| ITTItt Inc | 4.51% | 0.02% | 4.49% |
| WMSAdvanced Drainag Tm B 1ln 7/26 | 4.41% | 0.01% | 4.40% |
| CBRECbre Group Inc. Class A | 4.14% | 0.05% | 4.09% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 3.88% | 0.30% | 3.58% |
| WHWyndham Hotels & Resorts Inc | 4.09% | 0.01% | 4.08% |
| TWTradeweb Markets Inc | 3.94% | 0.02% | 3.92% |
| HEI.AHeico Corp. Class A | 3.92% | 0.03% | 3.89% |
| GWREGuidewire Software Inc | 3.87% | 0.02% | 3.85% |
96.4% of BBHM is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBHM or VTI?
BBHM has an expense ratio of 0.81% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $78 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBHM or VTI?
Over the past year BBHM returned +11.35% vs +12.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBHM or VTI?
BBHM has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI.
Should I hold both BBHM and VTI?
BBHM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBHM and VTI?
96.4% of BBHM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.9% of VTI's is in holdings BBHM also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BBHM and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBHM or VTI?
BBHM yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBHM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.