BCFN vs IVV

BCFN vs IVV

Which is better, BCFN or IVV?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.6%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCFNIVV
Expense Ratio0.80%0.03%Best
AUM-$886.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.10%
Holdings44508
YTD Return-4.49%+13.39%Best
1Y Return-+20.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.29%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.88%
Top 10 Weight45.6%37.9%Best
Fund FamilyBaron FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 12, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BCFN vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BCFN vs IVV Performance

Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) is an ETF from Baron Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BCFN is down 4.49% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCFN charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCFN currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

BCFN already in IVV72.7%
IVV already in BCFN6.5%

72.7% of BCFN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 6.5% of IVV's money is in holdings BCFN also owns.

Most of BCFN is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

25 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BCFN and 505 in IVV, against full books of 44 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 472 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BCFN (92.8% of the fund), and 13 for BCFN that do not appear in IVV (18.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCFNWeight in IVVDifference
VVisa Inc Class A5.79%0.92%4.87%
MAMastercard Inc5.71%0.69%5.02%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.95%1.45%3.50%
BACBank of America Corp.: Financials5.03%0.62%4.41%
SCHWSchwab Strategic T4.55%0.27%4.28%
MSMorgan Stanley4.09%0.39%3.70%
IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc4.20%0.06%4.14%
SPGIS&p Global Inc.3.74%0.19%3.55%
MCOMoody'S Corp.3.62%0.11%3.51%
KKRKkr & Co. Inc. Class a3.49%0.11%3.38%

72.7% of BCFN is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BCFNIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCFN or IVV?

BCFN has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BCFN and IVV?

72.7% of BCFN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 6.5% of IVV's is in holdings BCFN also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BCFN and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCFN or IVV?

BCFN yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BCFN?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.