BCGS vs VTI

BCGS vs VTI

Which is better, BCGS or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. BCGS is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: BCGS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCGSVTI
Expense Ratio0.80%0.03%Best
AUM$41M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.44%1.03%
Holdings553,543
YTD Return+5.54%+11.06%Best
1Y Return-+15.41%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.48%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.52%
Top 10 Weight21.3%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyBancreek Capital AdvisorsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 9, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BCGS vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BCGS vs VTI Performance

Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BCGS is up 5.54% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCGS charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGS currently yields 0.44% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

BCGS already in VTI53.4%
VTI already in BCGS15.6%

53.4% of BCGS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 15.6% of VTI's money is in holdings BCGS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

27 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BCGS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 55 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,125 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BCGS (81.9% of the fund), and 1 for BCGS that do not appear in VTI (2.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCGSWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp2.04%6.40%4.36%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.00%2.90%0.90%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.07%2.56%0.49%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.16%1.70%0.46%
NFLXNetflix, Inc.2.05%0.42%1.63%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A2.17%0.27%1.90%
STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc1.95%0.27%1.68%
WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 31.95%0.26%1.69%
APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A2.05%0.15%1.90%
PHParker-Hannifin Corp.1.94%0.17%1.77%

53.4% of BCGS is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BCGSVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCGS or VTI?

BCGS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BCGS and VTI?

53.4% of BCGS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 15.6% of VTI's is in holdings BCGS also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BCGS and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCGS or VTI?

BCGS yields 0.44% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than BCGS?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. BCGS is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.