BCGS vs IVV

BCGS vs IVV

Which is better, BCGS or IVV?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BCGS is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: BCGS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCGSIVV
Expense Ratio0.80%0.03%Best
AUM$41M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.44%1.06%
Holdings55508
YTD Return+6.32%+12.01%Best
1Y Return-+16.48%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.21%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight21.3%Best37.8%
Fund FamilyBancreek Capital AdvisorsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 9, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BCGS vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BCGS vs IVV Performance

Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BCGS is up 6.32% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCGS charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGS currently yields 0.44% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

BCGS already in IVV33.7%
IVV already in BCGS17.7%

33.7% of BCGS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 17.7% of IVV's money is in holdings BCGS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

17 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BCGS and 490 in IVV, against full books of 55 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 466 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BCGS (81.0% of the fund), and 11 for BCGS that do not appear in IVV (21.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCGSWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp2.04%8.07%6.03%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.00%3.00%1.00%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.07%2.65%0.58%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.16%1.90%0.26%
NFLXNetflix, Inc.2.05%0.51%1.54%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A2.17%0.29%1.88%
STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc1.95%0.28%1.67%
WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 31.95%0.23%1.72%
APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A2.05%0.13%1.92%
PHParker-Hannifin Corp.1.94%0.19%1.75%

33.7% of BCGS is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BCGSIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCGS or IVV?

BCGS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BCGS and IVV?

33.7% of BCGS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 17.7% of IVV's is in holdings BCGS also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BCGS and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCGS or IVV?

BCGS yields 0.44% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BCGS?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BCGS is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.