BCGS vs VYM
Bancreek Global Select ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BCGS or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BCGS is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCGS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $41M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 55 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +6.32% | +13.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.22% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.3%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Bancreek Capital Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 9, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCGS vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCGS vs VYM Performance
Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BCGS is up 6.32% versus a gain of 13.08% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCGS charges 0.80% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $4 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGS currently yields 0.44% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
11.9% of BCGS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.7% of VYM's money is in holdings BCGS also owns.
BCGS and VYM share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BCGS and 557 in VYM, against full books of 55 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 523 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BCGS (89.4% of the fund), and 22 for BCGS that do not appear in VYM (43.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCGS and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCGS or VYM?
BCGS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCGS and VYM?
11.9% of BCGS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.7% of VYM's is in holdings BCGS also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BCGS and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCGS or VYM?
BCGS yields 0.44% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BCGS?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BCGS is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.