BEDZ vs VTI
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BEDZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.06% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.13% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.69% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.72% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.73% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
BEDZ vs VTI Performance
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BEDZ returned +9.69% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, BEDZ is up 8.13% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, BEDZ compounded at +13.72% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.73% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BEDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for BEDZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BEDZ charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEDZ currently yields 2.06% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BEDZ and VTI share 15 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BEDZ or VTI?
BEDZ has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BEDZ or VTI?
Over the past year BEDZ returned +9.69% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BEDZ annualized +7.81% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BEDZ or VTI?
BEDZ has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BEDZ -29.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BEDZ and VTI?
BEDZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BEDZ and VTI?
BEDZ and VTI share 15 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BEDZ or VTI?
BEDZ yields 2.06% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BEDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.