BEDZ vs IVV
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BEDZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.06% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.75% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.87% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.95% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.19% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
BEDZ vs IVV Performance
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BEDZ returned +9.87% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, BEDZ is up 8.75% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, BEDZ compounded at +13.95% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.19% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, BEDZ has the edge at +7.93% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BEDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for BEDZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BEDZ charges 0.99% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEDZ currently yields 2.06% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BEDZ and IVV share 8 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BEDZ or IVV?
BEDZ has an expense ratio of 0.99% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BEDZ or IVV?
Over the past year BEDZ returned +9.87% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BEDZ annualized +7.93% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BEDZ or IVV?
BEDZ has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BEDZ -29.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BEDZ and IVV?
BEDZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BEDZ and IVV?
BEDZ and IVV share 8 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BEDZ or IVV?
BEDZ yields 2.06% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BEDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.