BFLX vs VYM
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BFLX or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFLX | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 724 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +1.96% | +9.22%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.39% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 19, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BFLX vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BFLX vs VYM Performance
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BFLX is up 1.96% versus a gain of 9.22% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFLX charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFLX currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 68.9% of VYM's money is in holdings BFLX also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for BFLX, our book for it lists positions totalling 121.4% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, BFLX as of Sep 15, 2026 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
180 positions in common, counted across the 489 positions we hold weights for in BFLX and 557 in VYM, against full books of 724 and 608.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BFLX | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.95% | 7.35% | 6.40% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.15% | 3.82% | 3.67% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.20% | 2.51% | 1.31% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.91% | 1.66% | 0.75% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.32% | 1.07% | 0.25% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.54% | 1.52% | 0.98% |
| RLRalph Lauren Corp. Class A | 1.99% | 0.06% | 1.93% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.14% | 1.86% | 1.72% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.07% | 1.80% | 1.73% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 1.36% | 0.46% | 0.90% |
68.9% of VYM is already inside BFLX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFLX or VYM?
BFLX has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BFLX and VYM?
At least 68.9% of VYM's money is in holdings BFLX also owns. Our book for BFLX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 180 positions in common, counted across the 489 positions we hold weights for in BFLX and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFLX or VYM?
BFLX yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BFLX?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.