BIB vs QQQ
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BIB or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BIB led over 1Y and 3Y, QQQ over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BIB | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $103M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.28% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 261 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +37.86%Best | +16.87% |
| 1Y Return | +86.11%Best | +22.98% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.63%Best | +24.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.79% | +14.39%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.5% | 17.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.2% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,928 | $19,586Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2010 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 8, 2010 to Sep 11, 2026 (16.4 years).
BIB vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.4 years both funds cover.
BIB vs QQQ Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB) is an ETF from ProShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BIB returned +86.11% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, BIB is up 37.86% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Over three years, BIB compounded at +29.63% per year against +24.98% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.79% and +14.39% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +17.99% annualized vs +17.93%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BIB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.5% compared with 17.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.2% for BIB and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BIB charges 0.95% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $18 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIB currently yields 0.28% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 5.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings BIB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BIB, our book for it covers 60.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and BIB share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 252 positions we hold weights for in BIB and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 261 and 107.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BIB and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BIB or QQQ?
BIB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BIB or QQQ?
Over the past year BIB returned +86.11% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so BIB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BIB annualized +17.93% vs +17.99% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BIB or QQQ?
BIB has been the more volatile fund at 40.5% annualized versus 17.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BIB -67.2% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both BIB and QQQ?
BIB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BIB and QQQ?
At least 5.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings BIB also owns. Our book for BIB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 252 positions we hold weights for in BIB and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BIB or QQQ?
BIB yields 0.28% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BIB?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BIB led over 1Y and 3Y, QQQ over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.