BIB vs VOO
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BIB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BIB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $88M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 261 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +34.21% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +95.96% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.37% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.01% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BIB vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIB returned +95.96% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, BIB is up 34.21% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, BIB compounded at +28.37% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.01% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, BIB has the edge at +17.83% annualized vs +13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BIB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.4% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.2% for BIB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BIB charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIB currently yields 0.33% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BIB and VOO share 8 holdings out of 749 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BIB or VOO?
BIB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BIB or VOO?
Over the past year BIB returned +95.96% vs +21.79% for VOO, so BIB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BIB annualized +17.83% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BIB or VOO?
BIB has been the more volatile fund at 40.4% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BIB -67.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BIB and VOO?
BIB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BIB and VOO?
BIB and VOO share 8 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 749 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BIB or VOO?
BIB yields 0.33% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.