BIB vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BIB or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BIB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BIB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $103M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.28% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 261 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +37.86%Best | +12.57% |
| 1Y Return | +86.11%Best | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.63%Best | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.79% | +11.86%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.5% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,928 | $17,514Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 8, 2010 to Sep 11, 2026 (16.4 years).
BIB vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.4 years both funds cover.
BIB vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIB returned +86.11% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, BIB is up 37.86% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, BIB compounded at +29.63% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.79% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, BIB has the edge at +17.93% annualized vs +12.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BIB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.5% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.2% for BIB and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BIB charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIB currently yields 0.28% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 252 holdings in BIB and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 60.2% and 90.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 173 positions appear in both.
173 positions in common, counted across the 252 positions we hold weights for in BIB and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 261 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BIB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4.62% | 0.17% | 4.45% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 4.24% | 0.27% | 3.97% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 3.76% | 0.22% | 3.54% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2.49% | 0.09% | 2.40% |
| ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 1.55% | 0.06% | 1.49% |
| RVMDRevolution Medicines Inc | 1.50% | 0.05% | 1.45% |
| MRNAModerna Inc | 1.21% | 0.03% | 1.18% |
| BIIBBiogen Inc. | 1.14% | 0.04% | 1.10% |
| ILMNIllumina, Inc. | 1.09% | 0.03% | 1.06% |
| ROIV:BMRoivant Sciences Ltd | 0.95% | 0.02% | 0.93% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BIB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BIB or VTI?
BIB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BIB or VTI?
Over the past year BIB returned +86.11% vs +17.22% for VTI, so BIB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BIB annualized +17.93% vs +12.28% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BIB or VTI?
BIB has been the more volatile fund at 40.5% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BIB -67.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both BIB and VTI?
BIB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BIB or VTI?
BIB yields 0.28% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BIB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BIB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.