BIB vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BIB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BIB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $88M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 261 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +58.51% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +130.96% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.87% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.31% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
BIB vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIB returned +130.96% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, BIB is up 58.51% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, BIB compounded at +35.87% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.31% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, BIB has the edge at +19.02% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BIB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.2% for BIB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BIB charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIB currently yields 0.33% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BIB and VTI share 173 holdings out of 2866 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BIB or VTI?
BIB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BIB or VTI?
Over the past year BIB returned +130.96% vs +22.17% for VTI, so BIB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BIB annualized +19.02% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BIB or VTI?
BIB has been the more volatile fund at 40.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BIB -67.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BIB and VTI?
BIB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BIB and VTI?
BIB and VTI share 173 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2866 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BIB or VTI?
BIB yields 0.33% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.