BKDV vs VXUS
BKDV vs VXUS
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BKDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.11% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.36% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BKDV vs VXUS Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKDV returned +32.36% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BKDV is up 19.11% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.0% for BKDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BKDV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.53% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BKDV and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7943 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or VXUS?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKDV or VXUS?
Over the past year BKDV returned +32.36% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKDV annualized +21.73% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKDV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.0% for BKDV. Worst drawdown: BKDV -15.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BKDV and VXUS?
BKDV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and VXUS?
BKDV and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7943 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or VXUS?
BKDV yields 0.53% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.