BKDV vs VOO
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BKDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.99% | +13.49% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.96% | +20.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BKDV vs VOO Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKDV returned +26.96% while VOO returned +20.64%. Year to date, BKDV is up 18.99% versus a gain of 13.49% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.0% for BKDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BKDV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.53% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BKDV and VOO share 70 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or VOO?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKDV or VOO?
Over the past year BKDV returned +26.96% vs +20.64% for VOO, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKDV annualized +20.94% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKDV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.0% for BKDV. Worst drawdown: BKDV -15.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BKDV and VOO?
BKDV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and VOO?
BKDV and VOO share 70 common holdings with a 22.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or VOO?
BKDV yields 0.53% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.