BKDV vs VOO
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BKDV or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. BKDV is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 84 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +16.05%Best | +11.01% |
| 1Y Return | +24.82%Best | +15.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,841Best | $13,601 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.5%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2024 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.9 years).
BKDV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
BKDV vs VOO Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKDV returned +24.82% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, BKDV is up 16.05% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 11.9% for BKDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BKDV and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.52% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.8% of BKDV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 37.3% of VOO's money is in holdings BKDV also owns.
Most of BKDV is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
72 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 84 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 416 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BKDV (62.0% of the fund), and 7 for BKDV that do not appear in VOO (4.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKDV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.09% | 5.36% | 0.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.08% | 4.13% | 1.95% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.01% | 7.05% | 5.04% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.02% | 1.46% | 2.56% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.54% | 1.46% | 1.08% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.73% | 0.96% | 1.77% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 2.73% | 0.58% | 2.15% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 2.91% | 0.12% | 2.79% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.18% | 0.71% | 1.47% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 2.20% | 0.33% | 1.87% |
94.8% of BKDV is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or VOO?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKDV or VOO?
Over the past year BKDV returned +24.82% vs +15.60% for VOO, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKDV annualized +18.66% vs +17.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKDV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 11.9% for BKDV. Worst drawdown: BKDV -15.5% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both BKDV and VOO?
BKDV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and VOO?
94.8% of BKDV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 37.3% of VOO's is in holdings BKDV also owns. They hold 72 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or VOO?
BKDV yields 0.52% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BKDV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. BKDV is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.