BKDV vs VTI
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BKDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.40% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.76% | +20.29% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.42% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
BKDV vs VTI Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKDV returned +27.76% while VTI returned +20.29%. Year to date, BKDV is up 19.40% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.1% for BKDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BKDV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.53% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BKDV and VTI share 74 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or VTI?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKDV or VTI?
Over the past year BKDV returned +27.76% vs +20.29% for VTI, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKDV annualized +21.20% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKDV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.1% for BKDV. Worst drawdown: BKDV -15.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BKDV and VTI?
BKDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and VTI?
BKDV and VTI share 74 common holdings with a 20.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or VTI?
BKDV yields 0.53% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.