BLES vs IVV
Inspire Global Hope ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BLES delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLES | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $159M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.84% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 817 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +15.45% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.72% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.87% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.44% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Inspire ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 27, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
BLES vs IVV Performance
Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is a ETF from Inspire ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BLES returned +23.72% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, BLES is up 15.45% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, BLES compounded at +15.87% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.44% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, BLES has the edge at +9.53% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for BLES and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLES charges 0.58% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLES currently yields 1.84% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BLES and IVV share 135 holdings out of 769 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLES or IVV?
BLES has an expense ratio of 0.58% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLES or IVV?
Over the past year BLES returned +23.72% vs +23.70% for IVV, so BLES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BLES annualized +9.53% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLES or IVV?
BLES has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BLES -40.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BLES and IVV?
BLES and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BLES and IVV?
BLES and IVV share 135 common holdings with a 9.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 769 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLES or IVV?
BLES yields 1.84% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BLES currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.