BLES vs VOO
Inspire Global Hope ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BLES delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLES | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $159M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.84% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 817 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.45% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.72% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.87% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.44% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Inspire ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 27, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BLES vs VOO Performance
Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is a ETF from Inspire ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BLES returned +23.72% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, BLES is up 15.45% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, BLES compounded at +15.87% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.44% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +9.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for BLES and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLES charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLES currently yields 1.84% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BLES and VOO share 135 holdings out of 769 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLES or VOO?
BLES has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLES or VOO?
Over the past year BLES returned +23.72% vs +23.71% for VOO, so BLES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BLES annualized +9.53% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLES or VOO?
BLES has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BLES -40.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BLES and VOO?
BLES and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BLES and VOO?
BLES and VOO share 135 common holdings with a 9.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 769 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLES or VOO?
BLES yields 1.84% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BLES currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.