BOBP vs VTI
CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BOBP or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOBP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.86% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.94%Best | +11.06% |
| 1Y Return | +14.72% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.3% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $12,251 | $13,077Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Exchange Traded Concepts Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.3 years).
BOBP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BOBP vs VTI Performance
CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) is an ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BOBP returned +14.72% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, BOBP is up 11.94% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOBP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.3% for BOBP and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOBP charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOBP currently yields 2.86% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
85.2% of BOBP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 35.5% of VTI's money is in holdings BOBP also owns.
Most of BOBP is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BOBP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 52 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,105 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BOBP (62.0% of the fund), and 1 for BOBP that do not appear in VTI (10.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BOBP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.02% | 6.29% | 4.27% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.79% | 6.40% | 4.61% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.93% | 4.79% | 2.86% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.71% | 3.65% | 1.94% |
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 5.08% | 0.03% | 5.05% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.08% | 2.90% | 0.82% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.60% | 1.29% | 2.31% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 3.17% | 0.51% | 2.66% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.55% | 1.70% | 0.15% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.75% | 0.42% | 2.33% |
85.2% of BOBP is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOBP or VTI?
BOBP has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BOBP or VTI?
Over the past year BOBP returned +14.72% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BOBP annualized +16.90% vs +22.92% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BOBP or VTI?
BOBP has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BOBP -16.3% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both BOBP and VTI?
BOBP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BOBP and VTI?
85.2% of BOBP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 35.5% of VTI's is in holdings BOBP also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BOBP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOBP or VTI?
BOBP yields 2.86% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BOBP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BOBP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.