BUL vs VOO
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BUL or VOO?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BUL led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $143M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +15.30%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +20.38%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.94% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.86% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.3% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,745 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.1% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 3, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.3 years).
BUL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.
BUL vs VOO Performance
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUL returned +20.38% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, BUL is up 15.30% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, BUL compounded at +20.94% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.86% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.25% annualized vs +14.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 16.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.3% for BUL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUL charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUL currently yields 0.21% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
49.8% of BUL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.0% of VOO's money is in holdings BUL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BUL and 505 in VOO, against full books of 51 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 485 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BUL (98.5% of the fund), and 37 for BUL that do not appear in VOO (46.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 5.59% | 0.21% | 5.38% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 4.96% | 0.23% | 4.73% |
| HCAHca-the Healthcare Co | 4.91% | 0.09% | 4.82% |
| CCLCarnival Corporation Common Stock | 4.81% | 0.06% | 4.75% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 4.63% | 0.15% | 4.48% |
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary) | 4.66% | 0.05% | 4.61% |
| TPRTapestry Inc. | 3.92% | 0.05% | 3.87% |
| LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp. | 3.79% | 0.02% | 3.77% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 3.39% | 0.03% | 3.36% |
| FSLRFirst Solar, Inc | 3.26% | 0.04% | 3.22% |
49.8% of BUL is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUL or VOO?
BUL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUL or VOO?
Over the past year BUL returned +20.38% vs +20.08% for VOO, so BUL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BUL annualized +14.28% vs +15.25% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUL or VOO?
BUL has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 16.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BUL -37.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BUL and VOO?
BUL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUL and VOO?
49.8% of BUL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.0% of VOO's is in holdings BUL also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BUL and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUL or VOO?
BUL yields 0.21% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BUL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BUL led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.