BUL vs VOO
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BUL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $132M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.41% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.69% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.31% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.40% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BUL vs VOO Performance
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUL returned +28.69% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, BUL is up 16.41% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, BUL compounded at +21.31% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.40% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BUL has the edge at +14.56% annualized vs +13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.3% for BUL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUL charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUL currently yields 0.22% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BUL and VOO share 12 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUL or VOO?
BUL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUL or VOO?
Over the past year BUL returned +28.69% vs +22.62% for VOO, so BUL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BUL annualized +14.56% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUL or VOO?
BUL has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BUL -37.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BUL and VOO?
BUL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BUL and VOO?
BUL and VOO share 12 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUL or VOO?
BUL yields 0.22% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.