CCSO vs VTI
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCSO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $50M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 120 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.13% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.88% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.51% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Carbon Collective Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
CCSO vs VTI Performance
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF (CCSO) is a ETF from Carbon Collective Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCSO returned +13.88% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, CCSO is up 6.13% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, CCSO compounded at +12.51% per year against +21.85% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, CCSO has the edge at +8.96% annualized vs +8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for CCSO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCSO charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCSO currently yields 0.60% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CCSO and VTI share 56 holdings out of 2853 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCSO or VTI?
CCSO has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCSO or VTI?
Over the past year CCSO returned +13.88% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CCSO annualized +8.96% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCSO or VTI?
CCSO has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CCSO -23.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CCSO and VTI?
CCSO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCSO and VTI?
CCSO and VTI share 56 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2853 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCSO or VTI?
CCSO yields 0.60% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.