CCSO vs VYM
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CCSO or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCSO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $47M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 124 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.85% | +14.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.51% | +20.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.69% | +18.64%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.0% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $13,731 | $18,125Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.9% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Carbon Collective Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (4 years).
CCSO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
CCSO vs VYM Performance
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF (CCSO) is an ETF from Carbon Collective Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCSO returned +11.51% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, CCSO is up 3.85% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, CCSO compounded at +10.69% per year against +18.64% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +16.03% annualized vs +8.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 12.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for CCSO and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCSO charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCSO currently yields 0.60% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
34.5% of CCSO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.6% of VYM's money is in holdings CCSO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, CCSO as of Aug 17, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
12 positions in common, counted across the 122 positions we hold weights for in CCSO and 602 in VYM, against full books of 124 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 557 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CCSO (95.7% of the fund), and 82 for CCSO that do not appear in VYM (51.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCSO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NUENucor Corp. | 5.69% | 0.20% | 5.49% |
| JCIJohnson Controls Intl Plc | 5.35% | 0.37% | 4.98% |
| SCCOSouthern Copper Corp | 5.26% | 0.07% | 5.19% |
| WMWaste Management Inc . | 4.93% | 0.34% | 4.59% |
| CARRCarrier Global Corporation | 4.47% | 0.24% | 4.23% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc. Class B | 2.65% | 0.11% | 2.54% |
| XYLXylem Inc./ NY | 2.61% | 0.12% | 2.49% |
| OCOwens Corning | 1.13% | 0.05% | 1.08% |
| CWENClearway Energy Inc Cl C | 0.72% | 0.02% | 0.70% |
| LKQLkq Corp. | 0.60% | 0.03% | 0.57% |
34.5% of CCSO is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCSO or VYM?
CCSO has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCSO or VYM?
Over the past year CCSO returned +11.51% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CCSO annualized +8.25% vs +16.03% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCSO or VYM?
CCSO has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 12.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CCSO -23.7% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both CCSO and VYM?
CCSO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CCSO and VYM?
34.5% of CCSO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.6% of VYM's is in holdings CCSO also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 122 positions we hold weights for in CCSO and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCSO or VYM?
CCSO yields 0.60% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CCSO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.