CDC vs QQQ
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CDC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $744M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.08% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.24% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.93% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.08% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.70% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2014 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CDC vs QQQ Performance
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CDC returned +21.93% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, CDC is up 17.24% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, CDC compounded at +14.08% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.70% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.4% for CDC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.4% for CDC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CDC charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CDC currently yields 3.08% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CDC and QQQ share 13 holdings out of 190 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CDC or QQQ?
CDC has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CDC or QQQ?
Over the past year CDC returned +21.93% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), CDC annualized +8.39% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CDC or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.4% for CDC. Worst drawdown: CDC -21.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CDC and QQQ?
CDC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CDC and QQQ?
CDC and QQQ share 13 common holdings with a 6.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 190 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CDC or QQQ?
CDC yields 3.08% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so CDC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.