CDL vs VTI
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Div Volatility Wtd ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CDL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $404M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.07% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.04% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.76% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.21% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.18% | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
CDL vs VTI Performance
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Div Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CDL returned +21.76% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, CDL is up 17.04% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, CDL compounded at +15.21% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.18% and +12.33% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CDL has the edge at +9.56% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.0% for CDL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.4% for CDL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CDL charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CDL currently yields 3.07% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CDL and VTI share 91 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CDL or VTI?
CDL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CDL or VTI?
Over the past year CDL returned +21.76% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CDL annualized +9.56% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CDL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.0% for CDL. Worst drawdown: CDL -41.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CDL and VTI?
CDL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CDL and VTI?
CDL and VTI share 91 common holdings with a 11.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CDL or VTI?
CDL yields 3.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CDL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.