CLIM vs IVV

CLIM vs IVV

Which is better, CLIM or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. CLIM is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: CLIM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCLIMIVV
Expense Ratio0.90%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$876.4B
Dividend Yield1.19%1.06%
Holdings81508
YTD Return+2.96%+12.39%Best
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.38%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.51%
Top 10 Weight30.0%Best37.8%
Fund FamilyClimate Global ETFiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 11, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CLIM vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CLIM vs IVV Performance

Climate Global - Climate Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) is an ETF from Climate Global ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CLIM is up 2.96% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CLIM charges 0.90% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLIM currently yields 1.19% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

CLIM already in IVV42.5%
IVV already in CLIM1.2%

42.5% of CLIM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.2% of IVV's money is in holdings CLIM also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

18 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in CLIM and 490 in IVV, against full books of 81 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 464 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CLIM (97.4% of the fund), and 59 for CLIM that do not appear in IVV (56.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CLIMWeight in IVVDifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.4.73%0.25%4.48%
PSAPublic Storage3.52%0.08%3.44%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation3.22%0.12%3.10%
PLDPrologis Inc3.06%0.20%2.86%
ORealty Income Corp.3.02%0.09%2.93%
VTRVentas  Inc .2.96%0.07%2.89%
SPGSimon Property Group Inc2.91%0.10%2.81%
IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv2.25%0.05%2.20%
EXRExtra Space Storage Inc.2.24%0.04%2.20%
CCICrown Castle International Corp2.12%0.05%2.07%

42.5% of CLIM is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CLIMIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CLIM or IVV?

CLIM has an expense ratio of 0.90% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CLIM and IVV?

42.5% of CLIM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.2% of IVV's is in holdings CLIM also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in CLIM and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, CLIM or IVV?

CLIM yields 1.19% while IVV yields 1.06%, so CLIM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than CLIM?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. CLIM is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.