CNRG vs VYM

CNRG vs VYM

Which is better, CNRG or VYM?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. CNRG led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.9%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCNRGVYM
Expense Ratio0.45%0.04%Best
AUM$207M$81.6B
Dividend Yield1.34%2.22%
Holdings43613
YTD Return-4.28%+13.75%Best
1Y Return+24.29%Best+19.42%
3Y Return (annualized)+8.49%+18.22%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-0.41%+12.17%Best
Volatility (annualized)34.8%15.5%Best
Max Drawdown-68.5%-35.7%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,797$17,758Best
Top 10 Weight32.9%25.9%Best
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 19, 2018Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2018 to Sep 9, 2026 (7.9 years).

CNRG vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.

CNRG vs VYM Performance

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNRG returned +24.29% while VYM returned +19.42%. Year to date, CNRG is down 4.28% versus a gain of 13.75% for VYM.

Over three years, CNRG compounded at +8.49% per year against +18.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.41% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, CNRG has the edge at +16.08% annualized vs +11.06%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CNRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.8% compared with 15.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.5% for CNRG and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CNRG charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNRG currently yields 1.34% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

CNRG already in VYM8.7%
VYM already in CNRG0.8%

8.7% of CNRG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.8% of VYM's money is in holdings CNRG also owns.

CNRG and VYM share little of their money.

3 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in CNRG and 603 in VYM, against full books of 43 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 564 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CNRG (96.5% of the fund), and 30 for CNRG that do not appear in VYM (72.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CNRGWeight in VYMDifference
NEENextera Energy Inc - Common3.01%0.76%2.25%
AESAes Corp2.95%0.04%2.91%
AVAAvista Corp2.72%0.01%2.71%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CNRG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CNRGVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CNRG or VYM?

CNRG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CNRG or VYM?

Over the past year CNRG returned +24.29% vs +19.42% for VYM, so CNRG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), CNRG annualized +16.08% vs +11.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CNRG or VYM?

CNRG has been the more volatile fund at 34.8% annualized versus 15.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CNRG -68.5% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both CNRG and VYM?

CNRG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between CNRG and VYM?

8.7% of CNRG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.8% of VYM's is in holdings CNRG also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in CNRG and 603 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, CNRG or VYM?

CNRG yields 1.34% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than CNRG?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. CNRG led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.