CNRG vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CNRG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNRG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $207M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.37% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +42.88% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.75% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.39% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.9% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
CNRG vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNRG returned +42.88% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, CNRG is up 2.37% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, CNRG compounded at +9.75% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.39% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, CNRG has the edge at +17.24% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.5% for CNRG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNRG charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNRG currently yields 1.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CNRG and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2807 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNRG or VTI?
CNRG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNRG or VTI?
Over the past year CNRG returned +42.88% vs +22.43% for VTI, so CNRG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), CNRG annualized +17.24% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNRG or VTI?
CNRG has been the more volatile fund at 34.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CNRG -68.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CNRG and VTI?
CNRG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNRG and VTI?
CNRG and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 2.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2807 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNRG or VTI?
CNRG yields 1.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.