CNRG vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CNRG or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CNRG led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNRG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $207M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -1.73% | +12.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +25.97%Best | +19.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.46% | +20.86%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.26% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.8% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -68.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,131 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2018 to Sep 8, 2026 (7.9 years).
CNRG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
CNRG vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNRG returned +25.97% while VTI returned +19.17%. Year to date, CNRG is down 1.73% versus a gain of 12.95% for VTI.
Over three years, CNRG compounded at +9.46% per year against +20.86% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.26% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, CNRG has the edge at +16.47% annualized vs +14.54%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.8% compared with 17.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.5% for CNRG and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNRG charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNRG currently yields 1.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 55.6% of CNRG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in CNRG and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 43 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CNRG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCELFuelcell Energy, Inc. (A) | 4.08% | 0.00% | 4.08% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 3.45% | 0.43% | 3.02% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 1.99% | 1.63% | 0.36% |
| ACAArcosa Inc | 3.48% | 0.00% | 3.48% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corp | 3.24% | 0.11% | 3.13% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 3.01% | 0.25% | 2.76% |
| AMRCAmeresco Inc | 3.19% | 0.00% | 3.19% |
| BEBloom Energy Corporation Com Cl A | 2.86% | 0.11% | 2.75% |
| SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc., Class A | 2.93% | 0.00% | 2.93% |
| FSLRFirst Solar, Inc | 2.87% | 0.03% | 2.84% |
55.6% of CNRG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNRG or VTI?
CNRG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CNRG or VTI?
Over the past year CNRG returned +25.97% vs +19.17% for VTI, so CNRG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), CNRG annualized +16.47% vs +14.54% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CNRG or VTI?
CNRG has been the more volatile fund at 34.8% annualized versus 17.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CNRG -68.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both CNRG and VTI?
CNRG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CNRG and VTI?
At least 55.6% of CNRG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in CNRG and 2,788 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNRG or VTI?
CNRG yields 1.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CNRG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CNRG led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.