CNRG vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CNRG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNRG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $207M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -2.10% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.05% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.91% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.97% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CNRG vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNRG returned +28.05% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, CNRG is down 2.10% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, CNRG compounded at +8.91% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.97% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, CNRG has the edge at +16.55% annualized vs +13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.5% for CNRG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNRG charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNRG currently yields 1.34% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CNRG and VOO share 8 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNRG or VOO?
CNRG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNRG or VOO?
Over the past year CNRG returned +28.05% vs +20.69% for VOO, so CNRG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), CNRG annualized +16.55% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNRG or VOO?
CNRG has been the more volatile fund at 34.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CNRG -68.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CNRG and VOO?
CNRG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNRG and VOO?
CNRG and VOO share 8 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNRG or VOO?
CNRG yields 1.34% while VOO yields 1.08%, so CNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.