COMT vs IVV
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. COMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.91% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 164 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +34.96% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.46% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.81% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
COMT vs IVV Performance
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, COMT is up 34.96% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, COMT compounded at +12.74% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.81% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.9% for COMT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMT charges 0.48% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMT currently yields 5.91% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
COMT and IVV share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in COMT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 11.13% | 0.15% | 10.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMT or IVV?
COMT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMT or IVV?
Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% vs +21.79% for IVV, so COMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), COMT annualized +3.80% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMT or IVV?
COMT has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: COMT -51.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both COMT and IVV?
COMT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COMT and IVV?
COMT and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMT or IVV?
COMT yields 5.91% while IVV yields 1.10%, so COMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.