COMT vs VTI
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. COMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2787 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.91% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 164 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +34.96% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.46% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.81% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
COMT vs VTI Performance
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, COMT is up 34.96% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, COMT compounded at +12.74% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.81% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.9% for COMT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMT charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMT currently yields 5.91% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
COMT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMT or VTI?
COMT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMT or VTI?
Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% vs +22.43% for VTI, so COMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), COMT annualized +3.80% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMT or VTI?
COMT has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: COMT -51.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both COMT and VTI?
COMT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COMT and VTI?
COMT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMT or VTI?
COMT yields 5.91% while VTI yields 1.07%, so COMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.