COMT vs VOO
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. COMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.91% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 164 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +34.96% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.46% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.81% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
COMT vs VOO Performance
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, COMT is up 34.96% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, COMT compounded at +12.74% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.81% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.9% for COMT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMT charges 0.48% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMT currently yields 5.91% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
COMT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMT or VOO?
COMT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMT or VOO?
Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% vs +21.79% for VOO, so COMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), COMT annualized +3.80% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMT or VOO?
COMT has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: COMT -51.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both COMT and VOO?
COMT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COMT and VOO?
COMT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMT or VOO?
COMT yields 5.91% while VOO yields 1.08%, so COMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.