COMT vs QQQ
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. COMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. COMT offers more diversification with 164 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.91% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 164 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +34.96% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.46% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.81% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2014 | Mar 10, 1999 |
COMT vs QQQ Performance
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, COMT is up 34.96% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, COMT compounded at +12.74% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.81% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.5% for COMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.9% for COMT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMT charges 0.48% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $18 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMT currently yields 5.91% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
COMT and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMT or QQQ?
COMT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMT or QQQ?
Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so COMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), COMT annualized +3.80% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.5% for COMT. Worst drawdown: COMT -51.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both COMT and QQQ?
COMT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COMT and QQQ?
COMT and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMT or QQQ?
COMT yields 5.91% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so COMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.