COMT vs VYM
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. COMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.91% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 164 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +34.96% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.46% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.81% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2014 | Nov 10, 2006 |
COMT vs VYM Performance
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, COMT is up 34.96% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, COMT compounded at +12.74% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.81% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.9% for COMT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMT charges 0.48% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $4 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMT currently yields 5.91% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
COMT and VYM share 0 holdings out of 605 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMT or VYM?
COMT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMT or VYM?
Over the past year COMT returned +39.46% vs +24.22% for VYM, so COMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), COMT annualized +3.80% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMT or VYM?
COMT has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: COMT -51.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both COMT and VYM?
COMT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COMT and VYM?
COMT and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 605 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMT or VYM?
COMT yields 5.91% while VYM yields 2.24%, so COMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.