CZAR vs IVV
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CZAR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.42% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 218 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +3.77% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.52% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
CZAR vs IVV Performance
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CZAR returned +4.52% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, CZAR is up 3.77% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.6% for CZAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.4% for CZAR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CZAR charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CZAR currently yields 1.42% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CZAR and IVV share 44 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CZAR or IVV?
CZAR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CZAR or IVV?
Over the past year CZAR returned +4.52% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), CZAR annualized +11.86% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CZAR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.6% for CZAR. Worst drawdown: CZAR -13.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CZAR and IVV?
CZAR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CZAR and IVV?
CZAR and IVV share 44 common holdings with a 15.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CZAR or IVV?
CZAR yields 1.42% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CZAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.